RPLG Founding Partner Jon Holtzman recently completed negotiations for a project labor agreement (PLA) that prioritizes State Center Community College District (SCCCD) graduates. The PLA was approved on March 10, 2020 by five of the seven SCCCD Trustees.
The proposed Charter Amendment establishes two processes the public may use to file complaints against police officers.
RPLG, as part of a coalition of law firms and public agency partners, filed a lawsuit on behalf of Jefferson Elementary School District in San Francisco’s federal district court on Monday against Juul Labs, Inc.
Attorneys from Renne Public Law Group and Bottini & Bottini, Inc. filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit against the Board of Directors of Oracle Corporation on July 2, 2020 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
RPLG, as part of a coalition of law firms and public agency partners, has filed litigation on behalf of South San Francisco Unified School District in San Francisco’s federal district court against Juul Labs, Inc. for its targeted marketing of electronic cigarettes to minors.
Renne Public Law Group has finalized an agreement to serve as General Counsel for San Francisco’s Downtown Community Benefit District (Downtown CBD).
Renne Public Law Group achieved dismissal of a case against officials in the California State University System in February 2020 on the grounds of qualified immunity.
Partner Art Hartinger, along with Senior Associates Ryan McGinley-Stempel and Ian Long, helped deliver two summary judgments for the Counties of San Joaquin and Orange this fall that will save the government entities millions of dollars in retiree pension dues.
School districts spread across the Bay Area have filed litigation in San Francisco’s federal district court against Juul Labs, Inc. for its targeting of minors. These Bay Area school districts are joining other school districts across the country, as well as a number of parents and youth, to challenge Juul’s practices of marketing vaping products to minors.
Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. Martin, Case No. 19-247—a decision in which the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that enforcing local laws prohibiting camping and sleeping on public property “when no sleeping space is practically available in any shelter” within the jurisdiction violates the Eighth Amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment.