Renne Public Law Group (RPLG) is thrilled to announce Laguna Honda Hospital’s recertification in the federal Medicare Provider Program. This milestone signifies that Laguna Honda is again a certified provider for both Medicaid and Medicare programs, marking the successful conclusion of the facility’s recertification journey.
Renne Public Law Group (“RPLG”) recently prevailed in the California Supreme Court on behalf of the Los Angeles County Assessor in Prang v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board.
Renne Public Law Group Trial Attorney Geoffrey Spellberg successfully represented Monterey County in a lawsuit brought by 16 County employees regarding the Natividad Medical Center’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. After nine days of trial, with another nine days to go, the [...]
On April 12, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, holding that development impact fees established by local legislation are subject to the Nollan/Dolan standards under the Takings Clause.
As part of Renne Public Law Group’s (RPLG) affirmative litigation program, we occasionally bring discrimination and retaliation cases on behalf of plaintiffs against corporate employers.
Renne Public Law Group announces that it has filed a federal lawsuit to stop the State and Federal Government’s action to force the relocation of nearly 700 residents at San Francisco’s Laguna Honda Hospital.
The Santa Clara Superior Court granted final approval of Google parent company Alphabet Inc.’s $310 million settlement to resolve lawsuits related to sexual harassment and misconduct on Monday, closing out litigation and negotiations that stretched almost two years.
Partner Jon Holtzman recently served as Special Counsel to the Fresno Commission on Police Reform (CPR), leading an RPLG team that provided guidance for the entire Commission.
Partner Linda Ross delivered a successful result for the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors on Nov. 5 when the Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma denied Sonoma County Sheriff Mark Essick's petition for writ of mandate to require the Board to provide funds for him to challenge Measure P.
Attorneys from two California law firms have filed several shareholder derivative lawsuits against the boards of seven major corporations since July, seeking to bring diversity to boardrooms and c-suites by holding the boards responsible for their false and misleading statements about diversity in the companies’ proxy statements.
